Effect of smartphone use on cervical spine stability.

Using a smartphone often involves a sustained head-forward tilt posture, which may deteriorate the mechanism of muscle reaction efficiency or reduce the stiffness of connective tissues of the cervical spine. These changes in muscular and connective tissues can impair cervical spine stability and contribute to developing neck pain symptoms. In this experiment, change in the cervical spine stability associated with a sustained smartphone use posture was evaluated by quantifying the effective stiffness and the reflexive responses of the head to sudden perturbations. Seventeen young smartphone users maintained their heads tilted forward approximately 30° for 30 min while watching videos on their smartphones in sitting. Data show that the measures of cervical spine stability did not change significantly after the smartphone use task despite developing mild to moderate neck and upper body discomfort symptoms. Study findings imply that keeping the head tilt posture for 30 min for smartphone use did not significantly alter spinal stability, rejecting its association with neck discomfort.

Effect of muscle pre-tension and pre-impact neck posture on the kinematic response of the cervical spine in simulated low-speed rear impacts.

Computational human body models (HBMs) can identify potential injury pathways not easily accessible through experimental studies, such as whiplash induced injuries. However, previous computational studies investigating neck response to simulated impact conditions have neglected the effect of pre-impact neck posture and muscle pre-tension on the intervertebral kinematics and tissue-level response. The purpose of the present study was addressing this knowledge gap using a detailed neck model subjected to simulated low-acceleration rear impact conditions, towards improved intervertebral kinematics and soft tissue response for injury assessment. An improved muscle path implementation in the model enabled the modeling of muscle pre-tension using experimental muscle pre-stretch data determined from previous cadaver studies. Cadaveric neck impact tests and human volunteer tests with the corresponding cervical spine posture were simulated using a detailed neck model with the reported boundary conditions and no muscle activation. Computed intervertebral kinematics of the model with pre-tension achieved, for the first time, the S-shape behavior of the neck observed in low severity rear impacts of both cadaver and volunteer studies. The maximum first principal strain in the muscles for the model with pre-tension was 27% higher than that without pre-tension. Although, the pre-impact neck posture was updated to match the average posture reported in the experimental tests, the change in posture was generally small with only small changes in vertebral kinematics and muscle strain. This study provides a method to incorporate muscle pre-tension in HBM and quantifies the importance of pre-tension in calculating tissue-level distractions.

Characterizing neck and spinal response in booster seated reclined children in frontal impacts.

OBJECTIVE: Belt-positioning booster seats (BPB) and pre-pretensioner (PPT) belts may be effective in preventing injuries from submarining and head excursion in reclined children. It is unknown if injuries at the neck and spine could still occur. This study's goal is to characterize neck and spine responses in reclined children with and without the BPB and the PPT. METHODS: Eleven frontal impact sled tests were performed (56 kph) with the Large Omnidirectional Child (LODC) dummy on a production vehicle seat. A 3-point simulated seat-integrated-belt was used with a load-limiter (∼4.5 kN). Testing was conducted with and without the BPB with the seatback at ∼25°, ∼45° and repeated once. One test was conducted at ∼60° with the BPB. 100 mm of belt-slack was removed to simulate PPT in two 45° BPB tests and the BPB 60° test. The LODC peak thoracic spine accelerations and angular rotations, and peak neck and lumbar force/moment loads were compared between conditions. RESULTS: Neck shear forces were the highest in the 60° BPB & PPT (-1.9 kN) and 45° noBPB (-1.3 kN) than all other BPB conditions (-0.5 to -0.8 kN). The highest peak neck moments were found in the 45° noBPB (-40.5 N-m), and in the 60° BPB & PPT (-34.2 N-m) conditions compared to all others (-20.8 to -27.9 N-m.). The 60° BPB and PPT condition demonstrated thoracic forward rotation similar to the 25° noBPB condition (25° noBPB -24.8 to -35.0 deg, 60° BPB&PPT -27.5 to -43.2 deg.). Thoracic spine peak resultant accelerations (T1, T6, T12) were higher in the 25° and 45° noBPB conditions (53 g to 71 g) and in the 60° BPB & PPT (T6: 61.8 g) compared to all other BPB conditions (48.4 g to 53.1 g). The lumbar peak shear forces and moments were the highest in the 45° noBPB (4.9 kN, -296 N-m) and the 60° BPB & PPT condition (1.7 kN, -146 N-m). CONCLUSION: These findings show similarities in neck, spine, and lumbar responses between the 60° reclined condition with BPB and PPT and the 25° and 45° conditions without the same countermeasures. This study highlights the need for future restraint developments to protect moderate and severe reclined BPB-seated child occupants.

Comparative biofidelity of the Hybrid III and THOR 50th male ATDs under three restraint conditions during frontal sled tests.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to provide a whole-body biofidelity assessment of the Hybrid III (HIII) and THOR 50th percentile male anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) during frontal sled tests, incorporating data from kinematics, chest deflection, and test buck reaction load cells. Additionally, the accuracy of the injury risk prediction capabilities for each ATD was evaluated against injuries observed in matched postmortem human surrogate (PMHS) tests. METHODS: Sled tests, designed to simulate a United States New Car Assessment Program (US-NCAP) frontal test, were conducted using the HIII, THOR, and 8 approximately 50th percentile male PMHS under 3 restraint conditions. The test buck was instrumented with load cells on the steering column, knee bolster supports, and foot supports. ATD and PMHS reaction force-time histories were quantitatively compared using the ISO/TS-18571 objective rating metric. Previously published biofidelity analyses of kinematic and chest deflection data from the same tests were combined with the reaction force analyses to perform an overall assessment of the comparative biofidelity of each ATD. Injury risk predictions from existing HIII and proposed THOR injury risk curves for the US-NCAP were compared to observed injuries. RESULTS: For the reaction forces, the HIII and THOR had similar levels of biofidelity on average, except for 2 locations. The HIII produced more biofidelic knee bolster support forces, and the THOR lap belt forces were more biofidelic. The comparative biofidelity of the ATDs also varied by body region. The THOR head response was more biofidelic, whereas the HIII thorax and lower extremity responses had higher biofidelity. When all body regions were pooled, the HIII was more biofidelic, but differences between ATDs were generally small. Both ATDs were able to predict the observed injuries, except for the HIII chest, HIII neck, and THOR neck, all of which underpredicted PMHS injury outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that biofidelity assessed through response time histories and accuracy of injury risk predictions do not always align. Specifically, the HIII had marginally better time history biofidelity, whereas the THOR had better injury prediction. However, not all THOR responses could be fully assessed, so more work is needed to assess the THOR in complex loading environments.

A Prospective Cohort Study on Risk Factors for Cervico-Thoracic Pain in Military Aircrew.

BACKGROUND: Military aircrew frequently report cervico-thoracic pain and injury. The relationship between risk factors and future pain episodes is, however, uncertain. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for cervico-thoracic pain and to determine the 1-yr cumulative incidence of such pain.METHODS: A total of 47 Swedish aircrew (fighter and helicopter pilots and rear crew) without pain in the cervico-thoracic region were surveyed about work-related and personal factors and pain prevalence using the Musculoskeletal Screening Protocol questionnaire. They also performed tests of movement control, active cervical range of motion, and isometric neck muscle strength and endurance. Aircrew were followed for a year with questionnaires. Logistic regressions were used to identify potential risk factors for future cervico-thoracic pain.RESULTS: Previous cervico-thoracic pain (OR: 22.39, CI: 1.79-280.63), lower cervical flexion range of motion (OR: 0.78, CI: 0.64-0.96), and lower neck flexor muscular endurance (OR: 0.91, CI: 0.83-0.99) were identified as risk factors for reporting cervico-thoracic pain. At follow-up, 23.4% (CI: 13.6-37.2) had reported cervico-thoracic pain during the 12-mo follow-up period.DISCUSSION: The Musculoskeletal Screening Protocol can identify risk factors for cervico-thoracic pain. The link between cervico-thoracic pain and previous pain, as well as lower performance of neck range of motion and muscular endurance, highlights the need for primary and secondary preventive action. The findings from this study can facilitate the development of such pain prevention programs for aircrew.Tegern M, Aasa U, Larsson H. A prospective cohort study on risk factors for cervico-thoracic pain in military aircrew. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(7):500-507.

Laptop use and muscle activity in adult females: Ground sitting has lower muscular demand than using a chair.

BACKGROUND: With progressing technology in the portable computing field, laptops are now integral for work, home and social settings. Different working postures adopted by laptop users impose different loads on the relevant muscles, which can be associated with musculoskeletal discomfort in the various body regions. Some Arabic and Asian cultures adopted postures are not well investigated, particularly for the 20-30 years age-group. OBJECTIVE: This study compared muscle activity in the cervical spine, arm, and wrist among different laptop workstation setups. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 23 healthy female university students (age = 24.2±2.28 years, range 20-26 years) performed a standardized 10 minute typing task in four different laptop workstation setups: DESK, SOFA, GROUND sitting with back support, and laptop table (LAP-Tab). Differences between electromyography (EMG) muscle activity recorded in the trapezius (TR), cervical extensors (CE), deltoid (DEL), and wrist extensors (WE) were determined using one-way repeated ANOVA measures with a post-hoc Bonferroni test. RESULTS: Significantly higher muscle activity was observed respectively in the workstations of DESK > LAP-Tab > SOFA > GROUND. Significant differences were found between WE muscle activity and the three other muscle groups (p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between workstations and muscle activity (F(9,264) = 3.81, p < 0.001, = 0.11), where the WE and DEL muscles showed respectively higher and lower muscle activity in all setups. CONCLUSION: Muscles showed variable activity in different workstations such that the GROUND workstation provided the minimum load, while the DESK workstation showed the maximum load on the measured muscle groups. These findings require further investigation in different cultural and gender specific groups.

Neck strength and force in reaction time task of adolescent athletes with and without concussion history: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Assess the impact of concussion by comparing reaction time, peak force recruitment, and rate of force development of adolescent athletes returning from concussion against age- and sex-matched controls in visual-elicited neck movement. DESIGN: Athletes sat secured in a custom-built isometric device with their heads secured in a helmet and attached to a 6-axis load cell. They performed neck flexion, extension, and lateral flexion in response to a visual cue. Three trials in each direction were used for statistical analyses; peak force and rate of force development were normalized against athlete mass. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 26 adolescent/young adult athletes (8F/18M), either recently concussed (and cleared for return to sport) or an age- and sex-matched healthy control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reaction time, angle, standard deviation of angle, deviation from target angle, peak force, and RFD over 50, 100, 150,and 200 ms of movement were measured for each trial. RESULTS: Concussed athletes had decreased normalized peak force (P = 0.008) and rate of force development (P < 0.001-0.007). In neck extension, concussed athletes also had decreased movement precision (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Concussion is associated with alterations of neck biomechanics that decrease overall neck strength.

The effect of tablet tilt angles and time on posture, muscle activity, and discomfort at the neck and shoulder in healthy young adults.

BACKGROUND: Although young adults regularly perform tablet writing, biomechanics during the tablet writing with different tilt angles has not been studied. The objective of this study was to compare posture, muscle activity, and discomfort at the neck and shoulder between tablet writing with 0° (horizontal) and 30° tablet tilt angles over 40 minutes in healthy young adults. METHODS: Twenty participants wrote continuously for 40 minutes on a tablet with both tilt angles in a randomized order. Between conditions, there was a 5-minute activity break. Differences in neck and shoulder posture, muscle activity, and discomfort between both tablet tilt angles and changes in the outcomes every 10 minutes over 40 minutes were investigated. RESULTS: With the tilted tablet, there were lower neck flexion (Z = -4.637, P<0.001), lower shoulder extension (Z = -3.734, P<0.001), and lower neck Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (left; Z = -4.699, P<0.001 and right; Z = -3.874, P<0.001) as compared to the no tilt condition. However, the right upper trapezius muscle activity was higher in the tilted condition as compared to the no tilt one. Over 40 minutes, the neck VAS (left; χ2(4) = 30.235, P<0.001 and right; χ2(4) = 32.560, P<0.001) and heart rate variability (χ2(4) = 12.906, P = 0.012) showed notable increases after 20 minutes compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, adjusting the tablet tilt to 30° and limiting time spent to 20 minutes are recommended for young adults during the tablet writing to prevent neck problems.

Influence of smartphone game play on head flexion angle, muscle activity, and load at C7 among adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Smartphones cause physiological problems due to inappropriate postures and extensive usage. India, being the second leading country with the highest number of smartphone users (492 million in 2021), has witnessed a significant rise in smartphone-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD). OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of 60-min smartphone gameplay on head flexion angle, muscle activity, and loads at C7 on Indian adolescents. METHODS: A subjective assessment was conducted on 1659 participants, of which, 40 young male adults aged between 20-28 years performed the experimental trial. Muscle (Sternocleidomastoid) activity, head flexion angle, and load acting at the neck (C7) were analyzed through postural assessment, pre-and post-subjective analysis. RESULTS: Participants maintained an average of 28.46°±4.04° head flexion angle for more than 43 min (71%) in an hour while performing the task. The muscle activity increased to 23% (p < 0.001) of MVC at the end of the task compared to the beginning. CONCLUSION: The results indicated a significant increase in muscle activity (1.61 times), spinal loads (4.6 times) and subjective discomfort (2.9 times) after prolonged smartphone usage. It is evident that various aspects (duration, posture, content) play a vital role in smartphone-related MSD and there is a potential risk of cervical spine problems. The increased loads reduce muscle stiffness and increase intervertebral disc pressure.

Effects of anti-fatigue lenses on performance, muscle activity and subjective discomfort responses during a seated computer task.

Anti-fatigue lenses (AFL) intend to provide health benefits in association with computer work. Their effects on visual and muscle discomfort mechanisms and task performance remain unclear. Twenty-three computer users (n = 12 males) underwent two 90-min computer sessions with AFL or placebo lenses. Eye strain, body discomfort, typing performance, upper trapezius (UT) activation amplitude and variability, and neck posture were analyzed for time, condition, and sex effects. No significant effects of condition were observed on the dependent measures evaluated. Discomfort increased over time (neck/shoulder: p < .001), more so in females (eye strain: p < .001). Females' UT activation amplitude was negatively correlated to eye strain in the placebo condition (p = .05).

Effect of Active Muscles on Astronaut Kinematics and Injury Risk for Piloted Lunar Landing and Launch While Standing.

While astronauts may pilot future lunar landers in a standing posture, the response of the human body under lunar launch and landing-related dynamic loading conditions is not well understood. It is important to consider the effects of active muscles under these loading conditions as muscles stabilize posture while standing. In the present study, astronaut response for a piloted lunar mission in a standing posture was simulated using an active human body model (HBM) with a closed-loop joint-angle based proportional integral derivative controller muscle activation strategy and compared with a passive HBM to understand the effects of active muscles on astronaut body kinematics and injury risk. While head, neck, and lumbar spine injury risk were relatively unaffected by active muscles, the lower extremity injury risk and the head and arm kinematics were significantly changed. Active muscle prevented knee-buckling and spinal slouching and lowered tibia injury risk in the active vs. passive model (revised tibia index: 0.02-0.40 vs. 0.01-0.58; acceptable tolerance: 0.43). Head displacement was higher in the active vs. passive model (11.6 vs. 9.0 cm forward, 6.3 vs. 7.0 cm backward, 7.9 vs. 7.3 cm downward, 3.7 vs. 2.4 cm lateral). Lower arm movement was seen with the active vs. passive model (23 vs. 35 cm backward, 12 vs. 20 cm downward). Overall simulations suggest that the passive model may overpredict injury risk in astronauts for spaceflight loading conditions, which can be improved using the model with active musculature.

Motion sequence criteria for favorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts.

OBJECTIVE: Rear-impact restraint guidelines have not developed to the same degree as for frontal crashes. This study provides criteria for favorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts. METHODS: Rear criteria were developed as an extension of Adomeit and Heger (1975) and Adomeit (1977) motion sequence criteria (MSC) for favorable occupant kinematics in frontal crashes. In this study, occupant kinematics in rear sled tests were studied to develop motion sequence criteria for favorable and unfavorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts with containment of the hip on the seat and no ramping up the seatback. RESULTS: Rear MSC limit the angle of the torso (α) rearward of vertical to less than the critical angle (αc) for ramping up the seatback and H-pt displacement rearward and downward, so zHpt < zHpt0, where zHpt0 is the initial height of the H-pt. The lateral displacement of the occupant is limited to less than the critical lateral displacement yT1c, where the head becomes unsupported by the head restraint or the chest by the seatback. The rear MSC contain the pelvis on the seat and provide uniform support of the torso, head and neck. Most front seats in production provide reasonably favorable occupant kinematics in rear impacts up to 40 km/h (25 mph) delta V with the 50th Hybrid III. Kinematics become unfavorable in testing at higher severities and with heavier occupants. The amount of energy that the seat needs to transfer to the occupant in a rear impact depends on the delta V (ΔV or change in velocity) of the vehicle and the mass of the occupant (m) among other variables. The seat provides an interface with the occupant and transfers energy (E), which can be approximated by E = ½*0.7*m(ΔV)2 using 70% of the occupant mass (m) and delta V. Rear MSC provide performance guidelines to advance seat designs with favorable occupant kinematics at higher energy transfer levels in rear impacts. Sled testing at 40 km/h (25 mph) involves an energy transfer of 3,421 J with the 50th Hybrid III generally gives favorable kinematics. A 56.3 km/h (35 mph) test involves 6,704 J, double the energy transfer and often unfavorable kinematics. A target energy needs to be set, and there are practical limits because the energy transfer is 12,858 J with a 150 kg (330 lb) occupant in a 56.3 km/h (35 mph) delta V rear crash. CONCLUSION: Rear motion sequence criteria (MSC) define favorable kinematics in rear impacts. MSC complement the assessment of biomechanical responses in sled and crash testing to ensure an overall evaluation of occupant restraint in rear impacts.

Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.

OBJECTIVE: In rear impacts, the seat and seatbelt are intended to provide occupant restraint and maintain the occupant on the seat with favorable kinematics and low biomechanical responses. This study analyzes the lack of restraint provided by lap-shoulder belts in rear impacts with and without pretensioning and offers thoughts on ways to provide early restraint by seatbelts. METHODS: Rear sled tests were conducted at 40.2 km/h (25 mph) delta V with a lap-shoulder belted, instrumented 50th Hybrid III. The dummy instrumentation included head, chest and pelvis triaxial acceleration and upper and lower neck triaxial loads and moments. Lap and shoulder belt loads were measured. High-speed video recorded different views of the occupant kinematics. In the first series, two sled tests were conducted with a Ford F-150 driver seat. One test was with the standard lap-shoulder belts only and a second with buckle pretensioner activation. In the second series, three matched tests were conducted with a Ford Escape driver seat. One test was with the lap-shoulder belts only, a second with retractor and anchor pretensioning and a third with only retractor pretensioning. The analysis included occupant kinematics, lap-belt movement and estimation of the load on the occupant's torso. The load was the sum of force on the upper and lower torso. The upper torso mass was 30.8 kg (67.8 lb) based on GEBOD data for the 50th Hybrid III. It was multiplied by the resultant chest acceleration to calculate the upper torso force. The lower-torso mass was 30.9 kg (68.0 lb). It was multiplied by the resultant pelvic acceleration to calculate the lower torso force. The total load on the seatback was the sum of the upper and lower torso force. The change in angle (θ) of the lap belt was determined by video analysis. The angle θ was from the horizontal up to a line through the lap-belt webbing. Ways to provide early lap-belt restraint were considered. RESULTS: The rear sled testing at 40.2 km/h (25 mph) showed that the seatbelt provided essentially no restraint of the rearward movement of the occupant. The seat provided essentially all of the rearward restraint with and without pretensioning. There was minimal lap belt load in the series with the dual recliner Escape seat, except for a spike caused by pretensioning. There was more seat deformation in the tests with the single-side recliner F-150 seat. There were higher belt loads. The lap belt limited the lifting of the hips and thighs with essentially no rearward restraint of the occupant. Tension in the lap belt did not relate to restraint of rearward movement of the occupant. Seatbelts provided forward restraint of the occupant during rebound with the belts providing noticeable deceleration of the chest and pelvis. Concepts were considered to provide early lap-belt restraint. One involved a rear pretensioner that dynamically moves the lap-belt anchor forward and upward while tightening the belts in a rear impact. This provides a lap-belt angle greater than θ = 90 deg before occupant movement. With this geometry, the lap belt restrains rearward movement of the occupant and pulls the hip down early in a rear impact. CONCLUSION: Seatbelts and pretensioners were designed for occupant restraint in frontal crashes, so it is not a surprise they do not provide much restraint of an occupant in rear impacts up to 40.2 km/h (25 mph). The lack of early lap-belt restraint is due to the unfavorable belt angle from the anchors over the hip. A concept is discussed that dynamically moves the anchors in rear impacts to provide early belt restraint.

The effect of seatback deformation on out-of-position front-seat occupants in severe rear impacts.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the effects of seat deflection in severe oblique rear impacts with laterally out-of-position ATDs where the head is not supported by the head restraint. METHOD: Six high-speed rear sled tests were conducted at 48 km/h with a 195 degree PDOF. A lap-shoulder belted 50th percentile Hybrid III ATD was leaned inboard and seated in six different front passenger seats (A-F); five of the seats were selected from mid-sized sedans and one was a non-production rigidified Seat Integrated Restraint (SIR) seat. FRED-III pull tests resulted in seat stiffnesses that varied from 73 to 172 N/mm. Seat F had the greatest stiffness. The seat and ATD responses were assessed. The biomechanical responses were evaluated and compared to relevant IARVs. RESULTS: In all tests the ATD moved rearward and twisted the seat. There was limited differential motion of the torso relative to the seatback. The ATD position and PDOF prevented head restraint engagement allowing head and neck extension over the seatback. The seatback angle was measured on the inboard side. At maximum yield, it was greatest with Seat E, followed by Seat A and Seat D, at 71, 67 and 62 degrees, respectively. The duration of rearward deformation was also greatest with Seat A, Seat D and Seat E providing longer ride-down. The head, chest and upper neck responses were below IARVs. Lower-neck extension moments were above injury threshold with Seat B, C and F. Seat F had the highest lower-neck moment. CONCLUSION: Seats with greater deformation provided the greatest ride-down durations and the lowest overall biomechanical responses. The combination of high impact severity and lack of head support resulted in high lower-neck responses, highlighting the potential benefit of energy management from deforming seat structures.

Head supported mass, moment of inertia, neck loads and stability: A simulation study.

Occupations or activities where donning head-supported mass (HSM) is commonplace put operators at an elevated risk of chronic neck pain. Yet, there is no consensus about what features of HSM influence the relative contributions to neck loads. Therefore, we tested four hypotheses that could increase neck loads: (i) HSM increases gravitational moments; (ii) more muscle activation is required to stabilize the head with HSM; (iii) the position of the HSM centre of mass (COM) induces gravitational moments; and (iv) the added moment of inertia (MOI) from HSM increases neck loads during head repositioning tasks. We performed a sensitivity analysis on the C5-C6 compression evaluated from a 24-degree freedom cervical spine model in OpenSim for static and dynamic movement trials. For static trials, we varied the magnitude of HSM, the position of its COM, and developed a novel stability constraint for static optimization. In dynamic trials, we varied HSM and the three principle MOIs. HSM magnitude and compression were linearly related to one another for both static and dynamic trials, with amplification factors varying between 1.9 and 3.9. Similar relationships were found for the COM position, although the relationship between C5-C6 peak compression and MOI in dynamic trials was generally nonlinear. This sensitivity analysis uncovered evidence in favour of hypotheses (i), (ii) and (iii). However, the model's prediction of C5-C6 compression was not overly sensitive to the magnitude of MOI. Therefore, the HSM mass properties may be more influential on neck compression than MOI properties, even during dynamic tasks.

Examination of muscular pain when using an innovative smartphone app for adults.

BACKGROUND: Smartphones are very convenient and accessible communication devices. Smartphone usage over long durations with poor posture can lead to musculoskeletal pain in adult users. OBJECTIVE: To compare pain in the neck, shoulder, upper back, lower back, arm, hand, and eye regions. METHODS: Thirty-five asymptomatic adults aged 18-25 years were divided into two groups: 1. use of an innovative smartphone app for the promotion of ergonomic behaviour (app use) and 2. no use of the innovative smartphone app (no app use). Participants sat upright, holding a smartphone with two hands, eyes 30-40 cm away from the screen, with frequent breaks consisting of stretching the neck and hand muscles while resting the eyes. The task involved taking part in online social networking for a duration of 45 minutes. A body pain chart and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the location and severity of pain. RESULTS: Pain in the neck, shoulder, upper back, arm, and hand regions in the "app use" condition were significantly lower than in the "no app use" condition at 15, 30, and 45 min (p-value<0.05). However, there were negligible differences between the two groups for eye pain, and lower back pain. CONCLUSION: Pain in the neck, shoulder, upper back, and arm regions in adult users in the "app use" condition was less than in the "no app use" condition. We would recommend that adults use the innovative smartphone app to prevent the risk of musculoskeletal pain potentially caused by smartphone usage.

Mechanisms of cervical spine injury and coupling response with initial head rotated posture - implications for AIS coding.

Objective: This objective of the present study is to describe the responses of the human head-cervical spine in terms of injuries, injury mechanisms, injury scoring, and quantify multiplanar loads.Methods: Pretest radiographs of pre-screened five human cadaver head-neck complexes were obtained. Cranium contents and sectioned the structure rostral to skull base. The caudal end was embedded, and cervical-thoracic disc was unconstrained condition. The loading was applied as a torque about the occipital condyle joint. The head and T1 were angulated 30 degrees and 25 degrees. Peak forces and moments at the occipital condyles were recorded using a six-axis load cell. After testing, x-rays and CT images were obtained. Injuries were scored using the Abbreviated Injury Scale, AIS 2015 version.Results: The mean age, stature, total body mass, body mass index of the five subjects were as follows: 63 years, 1.7 m, 78.0 kg, and 28.1 kg/m2. The mean peak axial force and coronal, sagittal, and axial bending moments were: 754 N, and 36.8 Nm, 14.8 Nm, and 9.5 Nm. All but one specimen sustained injury. Injuries were scored at the AIS 2 level. Two specimens sustained left anterior inferior lateral mass fractures of the atlas. While the transverse atlantal ligament was intact, some capsular ligament involvement was observed. In the other two specimens, although the same injury was noted, joint diastasis of the atlas-axis joint was identified.Conclusions: Using a PMHS model, the present study described the biomechanics of the initially head rotated head-neck complex under lateral bending in terms of injuries, injury mechanisms, quantification of the multiplanar loads at the occipital condyles, and underscored potential injury scoring issues for occupant protection. The issue of diastasis is not addressed in the AIS 2015 version. While this may not always result in immediate instability and require surgical intervention, it may be necessary to revisit this issue. Upper cervical fractures with diastasis and or transverse atlantal ligament involvement may be potential injury scoring factors for AIS consideration.

Analysis of control strategies for VIVA OpenHBM with active reflexive neck muscles.

Modeling muscle activity in the neck muscles of a finite element (FE) human body model can be based on two biological reflex systems. One approach is to approximate the Vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) function, which maintains the head orientation relative to a fixed reference in space. The second system tries to maintain the head posture relative to the torso, similar to the Cervicocolic reflex (CCR). Strategies to combine these two neck muscle controller approaches in a single head-neck FE model were tested, optimized, and compared to rear-impact volunteer data. The first approach, Combined-Control, assumed that both controllers simultaneously controlled all neck muscle activations. In the second approach, Distributed-Control, one controller was used to regulate activation of the superficial muscles while a different controller acted on deep neck muscles. The results showed that any muscle controller that combined the two approaches was less effective than only using one of VCR- or CCR-based systems on its own. A passive model had the best objective rating for cervical spine kinematics, but the addition of a single active controller provided the best response for both head and cervical spine kinematics. The present study demonstrates the difficulty in completely capturing representative head and cervical spine responses to rear-impact loading and identified a controller capturing the VCR reflex as the best candidate to investigate whiplash injury mechanisms through FE modeling.

A clinical test to assess isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD): a reliability study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical spine muscle weakness is well demonstrated in individuals with chronic neck pain. There is a lack of literature evaluating clinically applicable means of assessing isometric cervical strength in chronic whiplash associated disorder (WAD). This study assessed the reliability of self-resisted isometric cervical strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. The relationship between strength and neck pain-related disability and kinesiophobia was also investigated. METHODS: Twenty subjects with chronic WAD performed maximum-effort isometric cervical flexion, extension, side flexion, and rotation against a hand held dynamometer. The dynamometer was held by the subject, who provided self-resistance. Subjects completed two sessions of testing on one day with two different examiners, and one session on a subsequent day with one of the original examiners. Subjects completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) prior to the first testing session. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for directional strength measures were fair to high (0.71-0.88 for intra-rater and 0.79-0.91 for inter-rater). Total strength (sum of all directional strengths) ICCs were high for both intra-rater (ICC = 0.91) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.94) measures. All statistical tests for ICCs demonstrated significance (α < 0.05). Agreement was assessed using Bland Altman (BA) analysis with 95% limits of agreement. BA analysis demonstrated difference scores between the two testing sessions that ranged from 3.0-17.3% and 4.5-28.5% of the mean score for intra and inter-rater measures, respectively. Most measures did not meet the a priori standard for agreement. A moderate to good inverse relationship was demonstrated between kinesiophobia (TSK score) and six out of seven strength measures (α < .05). No significant correlation was found between neck disability (NDI) and cervical strength in any direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated fair to high reliability of self resisted isometric cervical strength testing in the chronic WAD population. All directional strength measures except flexion demonstrated a significant inverse relationship with kinesiophobia. No cervical strength measures were correlated with neck disability. These results support testing cervical strength in this manner to reliably assess change over time within individual patients. The value of such measurement requires further consideration given the lack of correlation between cervical strength and disability. Further research is required to establish normative values and enhance clinical utility.

Head Pitch Angular Velocity Discriminates (Sub-)Acute Neck Pain Patients and Controls Assessed with the DidRen Laser Test.

Understanding neck pain is an important societal issue. Kinematic data from sensors may help to gain insight into the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with neck pain through a quantitative sensorimotor assessment of one patient. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential usefulness of artificial intelligence with several machine learning (ML) algorithms in assessing neck sensorimotor performance. Angular velocity and acceleration measured by an inertial sensor placed on the forehead during the DidRen laser test in thirty-eight acute and subacute non-specific neck pain (ANSP) patients were compared to forty-two healthy control participants (HCP). Seven supervised ML algorithms were chosen for the predictions. The most informative kinematic features were computed using Sequential Feature Selection methods. The best performing algorithm is the Linear Support Vector Machine with an accuracy of 82% and Area Under Curve of 84%. The best discriminative kinematic feature between ANSP patients and HCP is the first quartile of head pitch angular velocity. This study has shown that supervised ML algorithms could be used to classify ANSP patients and identify discriminatory kinematic features potentially useful for clinicians in the assessment and monitoring of the neck sensorimotor performance in ANSP patients.